The residents are exposed to a wide variety of pathology across the southern part of Louisiana. I chose LSU because it offers a diverse clinical experience using its various away sites. University of Central Florida COM, Orlando With this experience, I believe that I am becoming a more versatile clinician, surgeon, and person. I chose LSU because at LSU New Orleans, I get to work in different cities throughout southern Louisiana with vastly different types of patient populations. LSU in particular offers insight into multiple ophthalmic specialties as well as a strong staff base who genuinely enjoy teaching residents. In addition there is a wide array of pathology in both the city and outside the city due to its diverse population. There is a festivals for just about everything. I chose LSU because New Orleans is a wonderful city with lots of quirks, a tremendous amount of culture and delicious food. Louisiana State University HSC, New Orleans Overall, I’ve been really happy with my experience. We have a good work life balance and see a really diverse array of pathologies. We always hit our numbers, so that’s not an issue, and the culture is good: we are pushed to learn and grow, have support, and the residents are cool. I chose LSU because we work in many different clinics, our program has all of the subspecialties, and we get to learn surgery from many different surgeons. Faculty is supportive and approachable. –Marlene AzarįIU Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Miami There’s exposure to great pathology and diversity with all of the sites we rotate at. The number of training sites also meant I would receive a diverse training experience, which is invaluable and one of LSU’s strengths. I chose LSU because of the strong sense of camaraderie among the residents and the supportive nature of the staff. Jeremy Kress is an assistant professor of business law at the University of Michigan Ross School of Business.SUNY Downstate Medical Center COM, Brooklyn Kress has also been spreading the word about community bank risks in popular media, including a recent article in The New York Times and an appearance on the Business Scholarship Podcast. The article concludes by describing a suggested new framework for regulating community banks to reduce future risks. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, community banks were key participants in the 2008 crisis, were not uniquely burdened by post-crisis reforms, and continue to thrive economically,” the authors write. “While these claims have gained near-universal acceptance among legal scholars and policymakers, none of them withstands scrutiny. In the journal article, Kress and coauthor Matthew Turk of Indiana University identify and expose three myths that have led to the deregulation of community banks. But appropriate oversight of small-bank risks is necessary to preserve the long-term viability of the community bank sector,” Kress writes. “To be sure, policymakers should not stifle community banks with excessive regulation. “Even worse, these new risks will be more difficult for the banking agencies to detect because regulators have loosened community bank supervisory oversight. 1 - are likely to expose the financial system to underappreciated risks,” Kress writes in the essay for American Banker. These deregulatory initiatives - many of which took effect Jan. “Over the past two years, policymakers have systematically rolled back safeguards on so-called community banks. In a new academic journal article, op-ed essay, and media appearances, Kress makes the case that when community banks fail, they tend to do so in groups - and that can lead to a broad financial crisis. Although economists often warn of the dangers from lax oversight of large banks, Michigan Ross Professor Jeremy Kress cautions that deregulation of small banks also poses substantial risks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |